Tuesday, August 18, 2009
All in the name of the poor farmer
Sunday, August 9, 2009
Good News
http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=VE9JTS8yMDA5LzA4LzA5I0FyMDIxMDA=&Mode=HTML&Locale=english-skin-custom
- How did the expression "back to square one" originate?
- Can someone die of a "broken heart" [induced for example by a girl/boyfriend jilting you)?
- Why does only 'February' have 28 or 29 days?
- What is the difference between a marriage and a wedding?
--
Thursday, July 30, 2009
Improve your CQ (Curiosity Quotient)
- Why do we give a "red" carpet welcome? (& not a "green" or say "blue" carpet welcome)
- Why doesn't a cell phone have a dial tone?
Monday, July 20, 2009
You ought to know this
Sunday, July 12, 2009
Atheist Bus Campaign
Sunday, July 5, 2009
Can you figure this out? (Edition 4)
- Why is our religion called "Hindu"? Most people to whom I asked this felt that the word must have come from the "Hindu-Kush" mountain ranges in the North - some felt that it has its origins in "Hindi" or even "Hindusthan". The fact is that all these words have been derived from "Hindu" and not the other way around. The real story borders on the comical. Apparently when the Persian army had camped on the banks of river "Sindhu" before invading India, Alexander asked his General the name of the river. Now in Persian (फारसी) language , स is pronounced as ह . So the General promptly told his master that they were on the banks of river "Hindu" - and then it was decreed that people who stayed in the land that lay beyond river "Hindu" were HINDUS.
- How did India get its name? Once again many feel that the name is derived from Indus which is the anglicized version of "sindhu". Our country was named India much before the British started their rule. It got its name because the country was the largest exporter, of the colour "indigo".
- Did you know that Lord Hanuman had a son? Ramayan tells us that Lord Hanuman had actually fathered (unknown to himself), a son - मकरध्वज. Apparently when Hanuman was in flight, his perspiration fell into the open mouth of a crocodile lazing below in the water. The perspiration was so potent that it impregnated the crocodile and unknown to Hanuman, a son was born. Later, when Hanuman was sent by Ram to save Lakshman who had been captured & kept in the netherworld (पाताल ) by Ahi Ravan, Makardhwaj who was guarding the entrance to the kingdom fought so valiantly with Hanuman that the latter was perplexed how anyone could survive the onslaught of his might. After defeating Makardhwaj with great difficulty, Hanuman was mightily pleased that it was his son who had so stoutly resisted him। Lord Hanuman howerver continues to be the most favourite GOD of the "bachelors".
- Did you know that the epic "Mahabharata" contains reference to every conceivable situation except a "divorce"? It has tales of men with many wives (Arjun), a woman with many husbands (Draupadi), women who have sex before marriage (Kunti), women who are unfaithful to their husbands (beheading of Renuka), women who need a man only to have children (Uloopi), women who want men only for pleasure (Urvashi), men who dress as women (Brihanalla), men who force themselves on women (Jayadrath), husbands who are comfortable with their wife going to other men (Pandu), men who become women (Bhangashavana), men who have mistresses ( Dhritrashtra) but none where men have divorced their wife। Does this mean that the concept of divorce is alien to Indian culture? Vyasa, the author of Mahabharata proudly claims that "what is not there in Mahabharata is not there anywhere"
- Why did anti-women practices like Sati, Dowry and now female foeticide take root only in India? Its not as if other religions or cultures have not had their gender biases - the church for example burnt 60,000 women on the stake - branding them as witches. Islam continues to treat women as second class citizens. Since it is men who have written religious codes of behaviour, it can be understood why they institutionalised the secondary status to be meted out to women. While Sati was nothing short of murder (induced through religious fervour), female foeticide is a direct result of the bizarre Hindu belief that it is only a son who can give you मोक्ष by lighting your funeral pyre. What pains me is the fact that none of our so called saints ever proclaim that these practices are wrong.
Thursday, June 11, 2009
Stay alive after death!
Sunday, May 31, 2009
How good a devotee are you?
Yes, we are indeed talking about devotion to GOD!
Most of us would equate devotion with prostrating before an idol of our favourite GOD or then keeping a "fast" (say on करवा चौथ ) or going to a temple on predetermined days or then carrying out a सत्यनारायण पूजा or going to holy places like Shirdi or attending religious orations (the ultimate fashion these days) . Do you think this is what real devotion is?
(1) Are you confusing devotion with rituals?
All religious rituals are supposed to create the right mental ambience to enable more effective communication with GOD. So, if you are a good devotee, don't feel satisfied at just following the rituals - keep track of the ultimate goal; that of communicating with the ALMIGHTY.
(2) Shouldn't Communication with GOD be strictly personal?
Every individual has to have a personal equation with GOD. This is not something that can be done collectively. Community Projects which require tangible assets (money, clothes, crutches etc.) need to be done collectively because the demand for these far outstrips the supply and a single individual, howsoever rich, will never be able to provide these. Praying to GOD is not a community project - it is an individual and a strictly personal activity and therefore should be done singly. The joint singing of devotional songs (आरती ), consuming the महाप्रसाद and doing जागरण can by no means be classified as PRAYERS. They are at best, group exercises. The moment you realise this truth, you will also realise that praying does not need to have a fixed time or day. There is a permanent hot line of your own, available to you all the time and always at zero cost. Haven't you heard that a first rate mind always thinks alone! A first rate devotee always prays (communicates) alone.
(3) Do you follow religious practices, out of fear of the unknown?
Devotion is not the monopoly of persons who are "religious" by nature. I conducted a small survey (which may not have a statistical significance, but which does indicate a trend) in which the following five questions were asked. Why don't you rate yourself on the same queries? Be truthful, though!
- गणेश , the elephant GOD "likes" मोदक (sweet eatable made out of sugar and grated coconut). For a change, will you be comfortable offering श्रीखंड पूरी on the day of गणेश चतुर्थी , this year?
- You perform the पूजा everyday, in your house. Will you be willing to give it a weekly holiday?
- Your family has been performing the traditional (nine days) नवरात्रि पूजा at home, since the days of your forefathers. This year, can you agree to donate an equivalent amount to an orphanage, instead of celebrating this traditional पूजा?
- You go to the शनि मंदिर every Saturday. The coming week, can you go there on a Sunday, instead?
- There are two sets of pundits (पुजारी) - those who perform the auspicious "पूजा " and others who perform the religious rituals after a death. Are you willing to invite one of the latter groups to solemnize the marriage in your family?
An overwhelming percentage of respondents were unwilling to do any of this and could not explain why. Ask yourself if you are a good robot or a good devotee?
(4) Are you the type who prays to ask for a favour ?
We sometimes put GOD in an impossible situation. We either want to strike a deal with HIM (I don't know why GOD is always considered male) or want to leave everything to HIM or want to berate HIM for favours supposedly denied. A good devotee prays because he feels "peaceful and contented", after doing so. This state of mind ultimately leads to better performance in whatever you do and these could be the real benefits of devotion.
(5) Do you make it a point to "understand" the philosophy behind the rituals that you carry out?
You will be surprised, but most of our children (and adults too) do not know the full meaning of our own national anthem. Imagine them singing something that they do not fully comprehend. How can we expect them to be filled with pride for the country, if they do not even know what they are uttering? This has been the bane of our education system. Parents do not help their children to understand what they insist the children must compulsorily learn to say (आरती or श्लोक for example), because they were never helped by their own parents to find these meanings. My survey says that more than 60% of the people who sing the most common गणपती ची आरती in Marathi (सुख करता , दुःख हरता …) do not know its meaning. Good devotees recite only what they understand and conversely, first understand what they want to recite.Sunday, May 17, 2009
Is our attitude towards youth, fair?
2) Youth as UPSTARTS and breakers of traditions versus youth as harbingers of change. Nothing is permanent except change. The dynamism and energy that the young ones possess make them try out various alternatives to a given problem (in a short time) and we sometimes interpret this as disrespect for the traditional approach adopted by us. No risks - no gains, they say. Many path-breaking discoveries have come about only because somebody decided to try something new. We all agree that without change, our society will wither. Why not think of the young ones as harbingers of change instead of berating them as upstarts? Try this change in attitude--it will do wonders for both.
3) Youth as morally corrupt versus recognition of the fact that moral standards could have changed. If you read history and literature written down the ages, you will realize that every generation has condemned its youth as morally corrupt. At this rate, the youth of today should be corrupt beyond all limits. But if you look at this from a different angle, you will realize that every succeeding generation has had slightly looser definition of moral standards of behaviour. With the onset of AIDS, this trend seems destined for a reversal. Soon, each succeeding generation will be more prudish. The “pendulum” of social norms would have then come back a full circle. Someone has said in a lighter vein that parents are not so concerned with why norms of moral behaviour changed but about why this happened so late?
4) Youth as selfish versus youth as responsive to only problems concerning themselves. A large percentage of adults feel that the young ones are selfish and show interest only if something concerns them. Being selfish is not a vice though being excessively so is not a virtue either. We must realize that a young mind lives in the immediate "present" and is more concerned with what's happening "here and now", as against "there and then". It is natural that it gets involved with its own problems rather than those of others. Later in life it realizes that solving others' problems leads to a greater satisfaction. Surely we can't blame the youth for immaturity -after all they are young.
5) Youth as disrespectful versus youth as more knowledgeable. All generations have complained about the young ones being disobedient and disrespectful towards their elders. It is difficult to digest that the younger mind is better informed and would not want to respect those elders who clearly appear less knowledgeable. Before accepting this theory, I would request all of us to truthfully assess whether in a given situation, we indeed are being confronted by a better informed mind. If it is so - let's not blame the whole generation. Respect is earned and cannot be demanded.
So my dear fellow - oldies! Let's resolve to stop looking through these coloured glasses and re-examine our pet attitudes and biases before forming an opinion about the young. Remember, the younger we are, the more we want to change this world; the older we get, the more we want to change the young. Let's remain perennially "young" in our thoughts.
I came across these unbelievable videos shared by Arvind Virmani, my IIM batchmate. They are symptomatic of the power of youth that we are talking about though frankly there is no age bar when it comes to befriending lions. E N J O Y...