2) Youth as UPSTARTS and breakers of traditions versus youth as harbingers of change. Nothing is permanent except change. The dynamism and energy that the young ones possess make them try out various alternatives to a given problem (in a short time) and we sometimes interpret this as disrespect for the traditional approach adopted by us. No risks - no gains, they say. Many path-breaking discoveries have come about only because somebody decided to try something new. We all agree that without change, our society will wither. Why not think of the young ones as harbingers of change instead of berating them as upstarts? Try this change in attitude--it will do wonders for both.
3) Youth as morally corrupt versus recognition of the fact that moral standards could have changed. If you read history and literature written down the ages, you will realize that every generation has condemned its youth as morally corrupt. At this rate, the youth of today should be corrupt beyond all limits. But if you look at this from a different angle, you will realize that every succeeding generation has had slightly looser definition of moral standards of behaviour. With the onset of AIDS, this trend seems destined for a reversal. Soon, each succeeding generation will be more prudish. The “pendulum” of social norms would have then come back a full circle. Someone has said in a lighter vein that parents are not so concerned with why norms of moral behaviour changed but about why this happened so late?
4) Youth as selfish versus youth as responsive to only problems concerning themselves. A large percentage of adults feel that the young ones are selfish and show interest only if something concerns them. Being selfish is not a vice though being excessively so is not a virtue either. We must realize that a young mind lives in the immediate "present" and is more concerned with what's happening "here and now", as against "there and then". It is natural that it gets involved with its own problems rather than those of others. Later in life it realizes that solving others' problems leads to a greater satisfaction. Surely we can't blame the youth for immaturity -after all they are young.
5) Youth as disrespectful versus youth as more knowledgeable. All generations have complained about the young ones being disobedient and disrespectful towards their elders. It is difficult to digest that the younger mind is better informed and would not want to respect those elders who clearly appear less knowledgeable. Before accepting this theory, I would request all of us to truthfully assess whether in a given situation, we indeed are being confronted by a better informed mind. If it is so - let's not blame the whole generation. Respect is earned and cannot be demanded.
So my dear fellow - oldies! Let's resolve to stop looking through these coloured glasses and re-examine our pet attitudes and biases before forming an opinion about the young. Remember, the younger we are, the more we want to change this world; the older we get, the more we want to change the young. Let's remain perennially "young" in our thoughts.
I came across these unbelievable videos shared by Arvind Virmani, my IIM batchmate. They are symptomatic of the power of youth that we are talking about though frankly there is no age bar when it comes to befriending lions. E N J O Y...
4 comments:
Congrats for an excellent blog.
Since I am constantly in touch with young generation I could relate many things with my personal experience.
I am very proud friend of many young people including my own son & daughter.
Tumche donhi blogs - youth ani mythology, vaachlet. Masta aahe. Majaa ali.
Great post about the youth. First time on your blog as I was searching other bloggers in Nagpur, and I was pleasently surprised to come over here.
Loved your posts on ?can you explain this". :)
Have added you in my blog list.
Keep up the good work,
Velu
It is not a question of youth against the experienced. It is more a question of man against man. I hold responsible the economic policies that we have been following for the past 60 years. This country has never allowed private enterprise to flourish during the initial 40 - 45 years after independence. Further the youth during the period from 1950 to 1995 were brought up by parents who had seen very hard times against the British. After the British left, Nehru and his socialists kept them deprived through the license raj. These people never had plenty to share and pass around and had to fight for every tiny privilege. Thumbing the youth down is an extension of this physiological problem where seniors feel that (a) we have gone through a lot of hardship to achieve this, how can the young get it easily? (b) let me first enjoy the benefits till my needs are satisfied and only then I will allow the young, (c) we made a lot of mistakes when we were young, how can we give the charge to the young and allow them to continue making mistakes, let then wait and learn first.
Another aspect of the problem is the huge jump in technology which the young have picked up and the seniors have not. The seniors therefore are weary of the young knowing that they don’t stand a chance in a fair competition. The only way therefore is to baulk and keep the young away.
Post a Comment