Though it didn’t strike me then, the best definition of GOD that I ever came across was in my sixth class text - book of Moral Science. It challenged the readers to think of any object that came to their mind. It then asked us to find out how that object came into existence. If, for example, you thought of “chair” as the initial object then “wood” would be the answer. The author then asked us to continue this exercise of going backward to find the cause of each effect. Thus ‘wood’ came from the ‘tree’ and the ‘tree’ from the ‘seed’ and so on. It then went on to define GOD as that “effect” which has no “cause” (the uncaused cause). This backward regression argument sounds so incomplete today - if there is indeed an omnipotent (all powerful) and omniscient (present everywhere) GOD, there has to be an even more powerful creator of such a GOD. Where is HE or SHE?
Any discussion on GOD usually gets caught in the controversy of whether GOD exists. I am going to skirt that issue because to my mind, it is of no consequence. For the believers, the question is superfluous and for the rest it is a pointless exercise because no one from the other camp is listening. Let us agree that this idea of a powerful CREATOR OF EVERYTHING seems to give solace to many. Like a wag once said, “atheists do not know whom to thank when something good happens to them, inexplicably”.
I have never been able to get cogent answers to some of these mind benders!
Why do GODs have to be married?
In Hindu mythology Vishnu has a Laxmi, Shankar has a Parvati, Ram has a Sita. Now marriages are socio-legal sanctions required by us humans to procreate. Why on earth would GODs require these? “Marrying GODs” is therefore a distinctly "human" idea.
Do GODs require “job descriptions” to manage their subjects?
Bramha creates, Vishnu preserves, Shiva disposes, Ganesha looks after all cerebral matters, Yama is the funeral director and so on and we are further told that they never transgress into the others domain. Don’t you see the human touch to this division of labour? Was it necessary for GOD to have so many assistants (or his own facets) if he was all powerful or is it that a human author created this organizational structure out of his or her own experience of how things are run on earth?
Why are even GODS, male chauvinists?
One can understand humans being male chauvinists but why GODs? Can they be unfair to half their creations (females)? While wives of all GODs are depicted as home-makers, (though they possess tremendous mystical powers) the GODs themselves go out and do the “mans work”. Barring a few exceptions (like Maa Kali) all godesses are made out to possess womanly qualities of love, softness & compassion. Please note that amongst human beings too there are a few exceptions like the Rani Laxmibai of
Why should GODs have their favourite eatables?
Time and again we are told that GODs are ethereal. How can they then have any bodily needs like hunger or sleep (in many temples, the resident GOD sleeps in the afternoon and devotees are denied darshan during those hours)? The system wherein a particular GOD likes a particular eatable seems to have been created with other motives in mind – so clearly “human”. Let us extend the logic a little further - with crores of devotees feeding all GODs so many sweets (as prasad) shouldn't all of them have got diabetes by now?
Why are GODs so fallible?
Hindu mythology is replete with examples of GODs granting a boon to even a villain who chose to pray hard with the sole and evil intention of getting that boon to trouble his fellow beings on earth. Are GODs so gullible that they could not see through the intention of this kind of devotee? Or is it the human authors’ wish to propogate the message that even sinners can pray and expect salvation, which has prompted such a picture to be painted? It seems so stage - managed, like a Hindi film.
The more you think about all this, dear readers, the more you will get convinced that GODs must indeed have been “created” by a human being. Otherwise, why would have so many qualities specific to humans, got attributed to GOD? There is no doubt whatsoever that this is the most popular creation of the human mind – in fact the best to date. The concept would not have survived the test of time, otherwise.
11 comments:
Super!
One of the reasons someone named a film correctly- ‘Gods must be crazy’.!!If we can create Gods out of human beings like Satya Sai Baba, Sai Baba etc, Rama, Krishna and others are way off! Why do Gods take bath with milk and honey?
A set of very good questions. we can spend a fortune of ourtime trying to get answers.
thanks for the mind benders
Best Wishes
The God(s) we know are indeed created by humans! As to why they have such human qualities: why does a robot have to look humanoid (two hands, two legs, a face, a voice). Most people will struggle with identifying the real-world robots (i.e. robots that are actually useful, and that look nothing like humans). When we want someone to take care of us, look out of our best interests and someone we can talk to, its very important that we relate to them. Hence the humanoid appearance and human-like tendencies. Why else would one believe a book whose author one doesn't know, whose content is literally out of this world and that makes taller promises than politicians, rather than an atheist (fellow human beings, often relatives!)?
Your conclusion though, is specious. That is similar to saying that since fish cannot really talk, look out for each other and have parental qualities as shown in Finding Nemo, fish must not really exist.
Atheists share their biggest flaw with believers: they assume that there is one consistent world-view that just fits, and therefore all others are simply incorrect. If God, or lack thereof, is indeed a figment of the human imagination, its manifestations (or lack thereof) also have to behave like human imagination: subjective, personal and open to interpretation. Thus in my mind God may or may not fit, but public religion certain does not.
Respected Prakash Bhai,
Namastey,
We tilt towards atheism because we have very faulty presentation of God which is more cultural than religious phenomena.Our Gyatri Mantra speaks of God which is fair
understanding of God and replica of that concept is available in Islam
In Islam, God has five major attributes :
1.Incomprehensible ; Any thing which could be comprehended by our senses then it is creation not creator.
2. Incomparable : Any thing which can be compared can not be God.
3. Invisible
4. Omnipresent
5. Omnipotent
The major difference between Islam & our Hindu Philosophy
is : In Islam every material( living/ non living ) is creation whereas in our Hindu Philosophy it is manifestation.
Why one creator : That is key for all our knowledge base.The Universe
has same physical laws. The worship
of God symbolises that one has to respect his physical & moral laws and by abiding those laws one could become harbinger of PEACE. PEACE is objective of our civilisation,which could only be achieved if we become
accountable to our GOD. In our Hindu Philosophy OM means SHANTI.One God unites us with all living and non living world. God is
TRUTH and seeking TRUTH is GODLY act.
Very Respectfully
Karim
Thank you Mr. Karim for your beautiful words. Without your permission i have forwarded your message to many of my friends. Please forgive. I am sure all my friends will enjoy your words as much as I have.
Dear Prakash,
The answer is very simple.
You are evidently talking of only the Hindu pantheon. Which like, even the so-called major/great monotheistic religions besides Buddhism, has an anthropomorphic basis for the deity/deities.
A clear proof, of course not to the mentally challenged theist, that man created god.
A 'different take has been posted by me on the site called Philosophy Papers
Dear Prakash
Every thing is GOD's creation
SS Deshpande
I have been trained by Mr.Prakash Shesh Sir in one training prog.He is such a delightful trainer! I really admire him for his wits & skills.
However, nowadays his blogs are becoming monotonous. A common thread of atheism is seen running through them.Most of the blogs are filled with sarcasm,cynicism & skepticism.They have become dry & only a mental circus.Most of the things he talks about,no person with commonsense will disagree.But now enough.I will really like to read something joyful& motivating from Sir.
For me, I cannot deny the experience of divinity within & without that I have during quiet moments.My experience becomes more important to me than my rationality.
God is pure Awareness. Hence,He has become everything & is in everything. But we do not experience this in our day to day life.So,we walk the spiritual path according to our inclinations. On the path are many traps one being dogmatic religion.
This is each person's own unique evolution process.The ultimate goal being Happiness & Supreme Love. Thank You.
Yes I think GODS are totally dependent on our way of thinking
Post a Comment